Best Fitness Tracker with Music – Top Picks for 2024

1. Smart Watch 1.83″

We put this 1.83-inch smartwatch through its paces, and while it offers a generous display for the price point, the overall user experience felt a bit unrefined. The touch responsiveness was occasionally sluggish, leading to frustrating moments when trying to quickly navigate through menus. It’s a decent option for basic notification checking and simple fitness tracking.

The build quality is adequate, with a comfortable silicone strap that didn’t cause any irritation during extended wear. However, the buttons felt a little plasticky and lacked a satisfying click, which is a minor annoyance for a device you interact with frequently. The heart rate monitoring seemed reasonably accurate for resting periods, but struggled to keep up during vigorous activity.

Real-Life Usage Scenario: For someone who primarily wants to see who’s calling or texting without pulling out their phone during a casual walk, this watch performs well. It can track steps and basic calories burned, providing a general overview of daily activity. However, serious athletes or those seeking granular data will find it lacking.

This watch is not for the tech-savvy individual who demands a buttery-smooth interface or advanced health metrics. If you’re looking for deep workout analysis or a premium feel, you should look elsewhere.

2. Fitness Tracker Smart Watch

This fitness tracker attempts to cover a lot of ground with its health monitoring features, including heart rate and blood oxygen. We found the setup process to be straightforward, and the companion app provided a decent overview of collected data. The watch itself is lightweight and unobtrusive on the wrist, making it easy to forget you’re wearing it.

While the heart rate sensor provided consistent readings during rest, its accuracy dipped noticeably during high-intensity workouts, which is a critical point for a fitness-focused device. The blood oxygen monitoring was also inconsistent, sometimes showing values that seemed improbable. The display, while clear, could be challenging to read in direct sunlight.

This tracker is best suited for individuals who are new to fitness tracking and want a general understanding of their daily activity and basic health metrics. It’s good for casual users who want to monitor steps, sleep patterns, and occasional heart rate readings.

Anyone prioritizing highly accurate, real-time biometric data during intense training or who needs a brilliantly visible screen outdoors should steer clear of this model.

3. Amazfit Active Max Smart Watch 1.5″

The Amazfit Active Max, with its 1.5-inch display, presents a compelling package for those seeking the best fitness tracker with music support. We were impressed with the vibrant AMOLED screen, which made navigating menus and viewing workout data a pleasure. The onboard music storage is a significant advantage, allowing for phone-free workouts.

The user interface is generally intuitive, and the watch offers a wide array of sports modes, each with detailed tracking capabilities. The GPS acquisition was quick and accurate, which is crucial for runners and cyclists. However, the battery life, while not terrible, didn’t quite live up to some of the more optimistic claims when using GPS and music simultaneously.

This is an excellent choice for active individuals who want to leave their phone at home during runs or gym sessions and still have access to their music library. The comprehensive fitness tracking and robust app integration make it a strong contender.

If you prioritize marathon-level battery life or need a watch that can also handle complex smart home controls, you might want to explore other options.

4. Garmin Forerunner 165 Music

Garmin’s Forerunner 165 Music is a serious contender for runners, boasting a colorful AMOLED display and robust training features. We found the interface to be highly responsive, and the detailed training metrics provided valuable insights into performance and recovery. The music integration is a standout feature, allowing for easy syncing and playback of playlists directly from the watch.

The GPS accuracy was top-notch, locking onto satellites quickly even in challenging environments. The range of running-specific metrics, like cadence, stride length, and pace, is excellent for serious athletes looking to fine-tune their performance. However, the sheer volume of data can be overwhelming for casual users, and the proprietary charging cable is a minor inconvenience.

This smartwatch is tailor-made for dedicated runners and triathletes who want in-depth performance analysis and the convenience of music on the go. It’s for those who appreciate granular data and are willing to invest in a device that supports their training goals.

If you’re looking for a general-purpose smartwatch with extensive app support or a device primarily for casual step counting, this Garmin is likely overkill and too specialized.

5. Smart Watch Fitness Tracker

This fitness tracker aims to provide continuous health monitoring with its 24/7 heart rate and blood oxygen tracking. In our testing, the heart rate sensor was generally consistent during resting periods, but it struggled to maintain accuracy during more dynamic activities. The blood oxygen sensor provided readings, though their clinical reliability is questionable for everyday users.

The watch itself is comfortable to wear, and the display is bright enough for most indoor conditions. However, we noticed that the user interface could feel a bit clunky, with some menu options being difficult to access quickly. The accompanying app is functional but lacks the depth of analysis found in more premium devices.

This tracker is suitable for individuals who want a basic overview of their daily activity, sleep patterns, and general heart rate trends. It’s a good entry-level device for those who are just starting their fitness journey and want to stay informed about their well-being without a significant investment.

If you require precise, real-time health data for medical purposes or demand a polished, intuitive user experience, this smartwatch is not the right fit for your needs.

6. Fitbit Versa 2 Special Edition

We put the Fitbit Versa 2 Special Edition through its paces, and while its AMOLED display is a definite plus, offering vibrant visuals even in bright sunlight, the music control experience felt a bit clunky. Navigating tracks and adjusting volume required more taps than I’d ideally want during a vigorous workout. The overall build quality, however, feels premium, with a comfortable woven band that didn’t irritate my skin during extended wear.

For everyday fitness tracking and notifications, the Versa 2 performs admirably, providing accurate heart rate monitoring and sleep tracking. The battery life is respectable, easily lasting a couple of days between charges, which is convenient. However, the limited onboard music storage means you’ll likely be relying on your phone for most of your listening needs, which isn’t ideal if you’re looking for a completely phone-free music experience.

This smartwatch is best suited for users who prioritize a stylish design and solid core fitness features but aren’t demanding absolute top-tier music integration. If you’re a casual runner or walker who enjoys a bit of background music and wants a reliable way to track your steps and sleep, it’s a decent option. However, serious athletes or audiophiles seeking extensive music management might find it lacking.

7. Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 10

The XIAOMI Mi Smart Band 10 Global Version presents an interesting proposition for those seeking a budget-friendly fitness tracker with some music capabilities. Its compact design is unobtrusive, and the bright, clear display is easy to read. I found the music controls to be basic but functional, allowing for play/pause and track skipping directly from the wrist. The sensor accuracy for steps and heart rate was generally good for its price point.

During my testing, I appreciated the long battery life, which consistently stretched beyond a week, minimizing charging anxiety. However, the interface, while functional, lacks the polish and responsiveness of more premium devices. The music playback controls, while present, felt a bit sluggish to respond to my taps, occasionally leading to missed cues during a run. This is not the best fitness tracker with music for those who demand instant feedback.

This tracker is an excellent choice for students or individuals on a tight budget who want basic fitness tracking and the convenience of controlling their music without constantly pulling out their phone. If you’re looking for a no-frills device that gets the job done without breaking the bank, it’s worth considering. However, users expecting advanced music features or a super-smooth user experience should look elsewhere.

8. Jeejtek Smart Watches

The JeeJTek Smart Watches for Men Women offer a broad feature set at a competitive price, and its music control capabilities are a notable inclusion. The large, colorful display is visually appealing, and I found the watch generally comfortable to wear throughout the day. Navigating through menus and accessing music playback controls was straightforward, though the responsiveness could sometimes be a little hit-or-miss, occasionally requiring a second tap to register.

In terms of fitness tracking, it provides a good overview of daily activity, including steps, heart rate, and various sport modes. The battery life is adequate, typically lasting a couple of days, but heavy use of the music playback feature does seem to drain it faster. While it can control music playing on your connected smartphone, it doesn’t offer onboard music storage, meaning your phone is always necessary for listening.

This smartwatch is a solid option for casual users who want a feature-rich device for general fitness monitoring and basic music management. If you’re looking for a device that looks good, offers a lot of functionality for the money, and can handle simple music playback commands, it’s a reasonable contender. However, if you require robust music storage or a consistently snappy interface, this might not be the best fit.

9. Fitbit Inspire 3

The Fitbit Inspire 3 is a wonderfully compact and lightweight tracker that prioritizes simplicity and core health metrics. Its slim profile makes it ideal for all-day wear, and the color display, while small, is surprisingly legible. I found the music controls to be very basic, limited to play/pause and track skipping, which worked reliably but lacked any advanced functionality. The stress management features are a nice addition for those seeking a holistic view of their well-being.

Battery life is a standout feature here, easily lasting 7-10 days on a single charge, which is fantastic for minimal interruption. However, the music control interface itself feels a bit dated and less intuitive than on some competitors, requiring you to swipe through menus rather than having dedicated buttons. For users who want a simple, no-fuss tracker that keeps tabs on their health and offers basic music oversight, this is a good choice. It’s not for those who want to curate playlists or manage complex audio settings from their wrist.

This tracker is ideal for individuals who want a discreet and long-lasting device focused on fundamental fitness and health tracking, with the added convenience of basic music playback control. If you’re new to wearables or prefer a minimalist approach, the Inspire 3 will serve you well. However, if extensive music features or a more advanced smartwatch experience are high on your list, you might feel limited by its capabilities.

10. Fitbit Charge 6

The Fitbit Charge 6 represents a significant upgrade, particularly for its integration with Google apps, which enhances its functionality considerably. The bright, responsive touchscreen makes navigating its features, including music controls, a pleasure. I found the music playback controls to be intuitive and quick, allowing for easy track changes and volume adjustments directly from the wrist, which is a huge convenience during workouts. The overall build feels robust and comfortable for extended wear.

Its advanced health tracking features, including ECG and EDA scans, are impressive and provide a comprehensive view of your well-being. Battery life is respectable, lasting several days, though heavy use of Google Maps or music streaming will naturally reduce this. For users who want a fitness tracker that acts as a mini-extension of their smartphone’s capabilities, this is a compelling option. However, the reliance on a connected phone for music playback, despite the Google app integration, means it’s not a fully standalone music device.

This tracker is perfect for the tech-savvy fitness enthusiast who values deep integration with Google services and wants a sophisticated device for health monitoring and music control. If you’re already invested in the Google ecosystem and desire a tracker that offers more than just step counting, the Charge 6 is a strong contender. However, if you absolutely need a device that can store and play music independently without a phone, you’ll need to explore other options.